Page 13 of 24
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Mon 13. Mar 2023 13:57:02
by ZeXx86
Then it works correctly. Your model is producing too low vibrations without blades.
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Mon 13. Mar 2023 14:04:57
by Storchy
Ok, thanks i will test the value during flight
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Mon 13. Mar 2023 20:02:50
by STC...
Hello,
will there be a new version of the LUA with the missing functions?
Like the parameters of the governor or reading out the event log.
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Fri 17. Mar 2023 20:55:11
by leatherface
Also interested in the missing pages of the ethos lua scripts(governor,logs ,servo travel correction etc). Is this something that is going to be updated in the near future? Would be very handy to have. Thankyou.
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Sat 18. Mar 2023 19:05:36
by ZeXx86
Certainly there will be update as we are doing for everything else.
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Sat 18. Mar 2023 23:28:06
by Bladescraper
ZeXx86 wrote:Hello,
this is very good. FrSky told us that S.Port is not supported for EthOS and integration.
We know that it works with some receivers but we dont know if this support will still work in the future.
We hope that yes. The list of tested receivers could be great.
Just FYI:
I reached out to my main HQ contact at FrSky and he said that S.Bus/S.Port integration have always been supported on FrSky's side, and it will always be supported. Since to my (and his) knowledge, the Lua/integration script is agnostic to the communication protocol used between RX and FC.
If you find a receiver that does not work with integration, regardless of protocol it uses, let me know - it's likely something in the firmware and can be fixed, assuming it has already been confirmed to not be something on the Spirit firmware/Lua side.
The reason I am just now replying to this is because I had the thread bookmarked on Page11 and failed to notice it had moved on by a couple pages

Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Sun 19. Mar 2023 4:22:27
by Dudemeister
Bladescraper wrote:
If you find a receiver that does not work with integration, regardless of protocol it uses, let me know - it's likely something in the firmware and can be fixed.
If you're looking for receivers that DON'T work with S-BUS /S.Port, then you don't need to look any further than the first post.
RX4R, RX6R, R-XSR, Archer RS, Radiomaster R161, RadioMaster R168.
I know the Radiomaster receivers are not FrSky, rather they're D16 clones, but by the same token, this should also affect
any D16 compatible receivers FrSky included.
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Fri 24. Mar 2023 22:17:49
by tysonfromcanada
I had good luck with the 3.5.0 firmware, X20s, Archer R4, Spirit2 and integration cable using f.port - everything seems to work in lua script on ethos.
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Tue 28. Mar 2023 16:05:52
by Storchy
I have now testet Position Hold and Altitude Hold.
Both function works very well.
Sometimes the helicopter pumps around the set altitude.
I think this is due to the low vertican gain and the wind, because my Goblin Buddy is very sensitive to pitch.
I think the software works very well
Re: FrSky Integration with Ethos, S.Port & F.Port
Posted: Tue 28. Mar 2023 18:29:02
by ZeXx86
S.PORT integration always worked with FrSky from the beginning, this is true. But not with EthOS. They want to move away from this protocol and use new F.BUS. We also recommend it since it is faster and more reliable protocol. At least in theory. In practise it will show later.